Secondary invasive fungal infection in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have been identified as a complication in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To date, there are few US studies examining the excess humanistic and economic burden of IFIs on hospitalised COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the incidence, risk factors, clinical and economic burden of IFIs in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in the United States. PATIENTS/METHODS: Data from adult patients hospitalised with COVID-19 during 01 April 2020-31 March 2021 were extracted retrospectively from the Premier Healthcare Database. IFI was defined either by diagnosis or microbiology findings plus systemic antifungal use. Disease burden attributable to IFI was estimated using time-dependent propensity score matching. RESULTS: Overall, 515,391 COVID-19 patients were included (male 51.7%, median age: 66 years); IFI incidence was 0.35/1000 patient-days. Most patients did not have traditional host factors for IFI such as hematologic malignancies; COVID-19 treatments including mechanical ventilation and systemic corticosteroid use were identified as risk factors. Excess mortality attributable to IFI was estimated at 18.4%, and attributable excess hospital costs were $16,100. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive fungal infection incidence was lower than previously reported, possibly due to a conservative definition of IFI. Typical COVID-19 treatments were among the risk factors identified. Furthermore, diagnosis of IFIs in COVID-19 patients may be complicated because of the several non-specific shared symptoms, leading to underestimation of the true incidence rate. The healthcare burden of IFIs was significant among COVID-19 patients, including higher mortality and greater cost.

Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacological stress tests in patients with a history of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Despite millions of COVID-19 cases in the United States, it remains unknown whether a history of COVID-19 infection impacts the safety of pharmacologic myocardial perfusion imaging stress testing (pharmacologic MPI). HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess if a prior COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher risk of complications during and following pharmacologic MPI testing. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis included 179 803 adults (≥18 years) from the PharMetrics® Plus claims database who underwent pharmacologic MPI between March 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. Patients with a history of COVID-19 infection (COVID-19 group) were compared with propensity-score matched no-COVID-19 history group for reversal agent use, 30-day resource use, and post-MPI cardiac events/procedures. RESULTS: The most commonly used stress agent was regadenoson (91.7%). The COVID-19 group (n = 6372; 3.5%) had slightly higher: reversal agent use (difference 1.13% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33, 1.92]), all-cause costs (difference USD $128 [95% CI: $73-$181]), and office visits (81.5% vs. 77.0%) than the no-COVID-19 group. Prior COVID-19 infection did not appear to impact subsequent cardiac events/procedures. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 history was associated with slightly higher reversal agent use, all-cause costs, and office visits after pharmacologic MPI; however, the differences were not clinically meaningful. Concerns for use of stress agents in patients with prior COVID-19 do not appear to be warranted.